Are employers vicariously liable for independent contractors?

Yes. The Vicarious liability tort asserts that proof of negligence against one part is unnecessary in a civil lawsuit that targets a second party in a self-definitive relationship. Primary examples of this kind of special relationship include: - ● An Employer and his/her Employees ● Parents and their Children ● A vehicle’s Owner and the Driver ● A Spouse and his/her Partner Consequently, an employer can be held legally responsible for the negligent actions of an employee.

Is an employer held vicariously liable for an employee that goes rogue?

Yes. The Vicarious liability tort asserts that proof of negligence against one part is unnecessary in a civil lawsuit that targets a second party in a self-definitive relationship. Primary examples of this kind of special relationship include: - ● An Employer and his/her Employees ● Parents and their Children ● A vehicle’s Owner and the Driver ● A Spouse and his/her Partner Consequently, an employer can be held legally responsible for the negligent actions of an employee.

Does vicarious liability apply in family-owned businesses, wherein the staff often are kids of the owner?

Yes. Vicarious Liability is substantially reinforced in a family-owned business where the staff are kids of the owner. The two unique relationships in such a business are employer-employee and parent-children self-definitive relationships.

Tag archives: Vicarious Liability

Vicarious Liability: Holding Employers Responsible When Employees Cause Harm

Jeremy Diamond
Categories: Media
Tags: AskSandraZisckind, Diamond and Diamond, Vicarious Liability, work injury
July 14, 2019

#AskSandraZisckind One of the essential tasks of an Ontario personal injury lawyer upon taking on the case of a client injured in an accident is to review the facts to determine who is responsible. For instance, it might seem safe to assume that a driver who fails to obey a stop sign crashes into another car causing serious injuries to its occupants is responsible for the crash and should be held liable to pay damages, but this might be only partially accurate. An investigation into the facts of the case could reveal that the driver who ignored the stop sign ... Read more